Category: Free Essays Examples on Entertainment Page 1 of 7

Charlie Chaplin uses many film elements to convey the story’s message. In Modern Times, Chaplin makes the most of editing’s many advantages to link the film to important themes like Capitalism, Great Depression, Industrialization, etc. Chaplin’s editorial choices are evident when analyzing the transitions, such as cuts and fades, and stylistic elements like time and reaction shots.

Chaplin’s films are primarily told through cuts. In the scene of the factory, cuts can be seen between the control panel and the assembly-line, as in shot 1 and 2. The control room is constantly shown in the background of all scenes, including the one after that clip. The boss tells the man in charge to hurry up. Charlie is seen frantically trying his best to keep up. These cuts are designed to build anticipation among the audience. This pattern of cuts from the assembly lines to the control rooms creates an anticipation in the audience. They can predict that Charlie will be affected by the changes on the assembly lines.

Modern Times portrays a satirical view of life for the working man in the 1930s, as well as the impact that industrialization had on his daily routine. This allows for both a comic anticipation and an emphasis on machines having a lot of power over people. Charlie struggles to adjust to changes in the speed of an assembly line. He eventually begins to twitch or act robotically. These cuts are shown frequently between the controlee and the controller in this film. You can see this when you return to the bosses office and reveal the “Bellows Feeding Machine”. Charlie is an ordinary working class man, but the Boss makes decisions without him present. They decide to test it on Charlie. Modern Times uses cutaways to make the working classes appear as marionettes. The upper class and industrialization are revealed on another platform.

Modern Times is also edited in a “continuity fashion” as were most Hollywood classics of its era. This involves a “real time action” where shots are used to follow each other. The next shot in clip 2 shows Charlie leaving the assembly, beginning at the exact point where the previous one ended. In this way, the audience feels as though they are there with Charlie, seeing his actions in real time. Chaplin used the style to both avoid confusing audiences and also to make them feel what Charlie experiences. In this way, he brought them even closer to Charlie’s character. The audience is forced to walk in Charlie’s shoes by watching him endure a full day of antics. By doing so, the audience can better understand the struggles of working men and better understand their frustrations, stress, and anxiety during the Great Depression.

Reaction shots are used in conjunction with the continuity-style. The film will always include reaction shots because there is no better way to illustrate Charlie’s distinctive qualities than by contrasting him with other characters. They not only enhance the comedy (as shown when Charlie experiences a mental breakdown and the other workers are in a panic), they also serve to separate Charlie from the others, which is precisely what Chaplin intended to achieve with this movie. Charlie’s differences are evident from the very beginning. He struggles with industrialization as a mild-mannered worker. Charlie, however, is childish, buffoonish and naive. Chaplin conveys this effectively by using reactions shots.

First, we see the fade from shot one to two, then three and finally four in clip 1. The film starts off with a scene of a flock of sheep, which fades into an image of men working. This contrasts men with sheep who are herded by an oppressive system to work, forcing them to perform unappealing tasks to provide bread for their families. This message is reinforced by the use of the fade, which keeps the viewer’s attention on the central figures. By using the fade to connect two shots, it is more effective than using cuts that briefly take the viewer away. Fades can be used to fill in for the absence of a central character. This is because it’s the first part of the film and without the main character, the audience might get lost. Fades help to guide viewers from one focal point to another by taking them away from the main action. After the scene has been contextualized, Chaplin will use cuts to tell his story.

Modern Times is a film that uses many transitions and styles. It is up to each viewer to decide how to use these elements to communicate certain messages or create certain ties. Cuts may not be seen as a representation of power, but by others as a means to enhance the plot. Due to its historical context, these cuts were necessary for dividing the actors by class. Some might argue that this choice of continuity was not made consciously, based on the meaning and characteristics, but by accident, due to Hollywood’s popularity. Chaplin had a degree in production and, thanks to his work as a film producer, he was able to use his creativity and innovate his films beyond slapstick. Charlie Chaplin’s Modern Times is a film that uses editorial choices to express certain themes. These include capitalism, industry, and class divisions as they were seen in the Great Depression.

Gillian Flynn wrote the screenplay and David Fincher directed it. It follows Amy Dunne’s disappearance on their fifth wedding anniversary. Since she has vanished from the house in Missouri, her husband is the primary suspect. There are evidences that suggest he may be guilty. Gone Girl shows how the media can mislead people. There are relatable stories and characters that have secrets.

Amy’s family contacted the media as soon after they heard of her disappearance. Amy was already known to the media because of her parents’ “Amazing Amy”, a book they wrote. Nick’s mistakes were causing people to suspect him of being guilty. He changed his audience’s perception after he appeared on television and spoke. Nick stated in an interview: “They hated me, and then they loved me.” The people used to hate me, but now they are in love with me. Some characters had their own secrets.

Amy’s parents wrote “Amazing Amy” for her as a child, so she spent her life trying to live up people’s expectation. Amy’s father and mother were both psychologists. When Amy stopped playing a musical instrument or quit sports as a kid, ‘Amazing Amy,’ kept going. So, ‘Amazing Amy,’ can be more engaging and make better choices. She will also become a role-model. Amy is a manipulative control freak who hides her true nature. Throughout the film, she uses her diary to tell her story, in which she manipulates both the police and audience into believing her. Nick wants to look like a hero and to be perceived as one. Nick begins to shed his “good guy” persona in the middle. Andie tells the world about their relationship, which leads to people believing that Nick played a role in the disappearance. Nick and Amy have both created false versions of themselves to fit their own fake reality. This shows their toxic marriage, which is built upon lies. Amy’s adventure brought her into contact with a couple that pretended to be friends but actually robbed Amy. Nick’s identical twin Margo went by the name “Go” throughout the film.

The film was filled with unexpected twists. Amy had planned the whole thing to get her husband back. She studied a lot of crime fiction and then recreated a crime scene that was only half-clean in her house. She created a fake crime scene that looked like an actual struggle. This would make it easy for anyone to identify Nick. He had betrayed her, stolen her money, and wrecked her whole life. She wouldn’t let him leave after what she’d done. Initially, she had no control, and acted the way he asked her to. However, after her plan was successful, she now has the power. Amy is aware that he won’t leave the film once she gains control. His image will be ruined. Amy was called a victim of kidnapping, a pregnant woman who had been cheated, and even a kidnapped person by society. Nick was called a liar.

The movie “Gone Girl”, in general, is a unique revenge film. People are not always what they claim to be, and truth will eventually come out. “Gone Girl”, shows that you don’t see everything. You may not even know what is going on in the background.

A director might describe me as a “tough audience” when it comes to TV series.

I don’t think twice when it comes to canceling a show in the middle of a season. This bad television is my fault. I blame my attention deficit disorder. Game of Thrones has never let me down. I usually leave a show when the plot becomes boring or drags on. After hearing the opening theme music, with its powerful drums accompanied by an intense cello solo, I became hooked. This show has captivated me from the very beginning, and it’s not just because I stayed up to watch each episode. The show introduced me to an amazing discourse community, which I’m very proud to belong to. Game of Thrones is a fandom that goes to another level.

Let me start by stating that Game of Thrones fanatics call each other “thronies”, “GoT fans” or “GoT-fans”. Sincerely, I think these nicknames are a result of the long title. The GoT community uses a variety of terms and phrases that a non-GOT or outsider could never understand. The Game of Thrones community knows that Danerys Targaryen, Khal Drogo, and their romantic nicknames “My Sun and Stars” and “Moon of My Life” are the most popular among fans. Fans of Game of Thrones use “Winter Is Coming” no matter the time or season. The phrase “Winter is coming” is used by GoT fans all year round, no matter what season or day of the year it is.

Even though our schedules may be different, they all seem to coincide around 8:45 PM.

You will need three things to begin this Sunday night tradition: a TV, a couch and HBO. After acquiring these three essential items, we can start planning how to watch the episode. GoT viewers should think about who they’re watching with. You want to avoid arguing for an hour about the show. My personal preference is to watch the episode alone, as I don’t wish for anyone to get annoyed or surprised by my comments. We all share the same goal, which is to watch each episode.

Fans will then take to the social media sites and express their emotions about that particular episode. There are Tumblr and Facebook blogs for Game of Thrones fans. Twitter is one of the best sites I use to gather feedback. The hashtag Game of Thrones is all I need to find fans. There is nothing more entertaining than watching a Twitter battle between groups of thrones. You can also find blogs discussing fan theories. Some sites, however, contain spoilers for the season. One of these sites has victimized me personally. I was curious and decided to read the leaked script of the death scene for one of my favourite characters. I was devastated. Apart from negatives, talking to other Game of Thrones fans and discussing topics and characters with them is my favorite thing.

Game of Thrones is not the only show with different views and opinions. The same can be said for the fans. One belief was not challenged before the season finale. The theory held that Jon Snow wasn’t the bastard of Ned Stark. Instead, he is the true son of Lyanna Stark – Ned Starks older sibling – and Rhaegar. Thus, Jon is the true heir. Fans also believe that two years is too long to wait for season 8, and everyone agrees on that. We will all always believe that we are united by our love for Game of Thrones.

A Game of Thrones enthusiast does not need to possess any specific qualities or attributes. To be a Game of Thorns fan, you must have seen the series and feel a certain interest or affection towards it. We respect each other’s opinions, even though there may be disagreements and debates within the fan community. It’s been two years since I joined this community, but I feel like I’ve been there ever since they aired the first episode of season one.

Even if the impact was small, this show left a lasting impression on all who watched it. This show has a lot of action, a storyline that is intense and contains murder, betrayal and incest. It will keep fans and viewers wanting more. Game of Thrones is a show that will forever hold a special place for me. The final episode of Game of Thrones will make me dread it, but that day is when I’ll start reading the books.

Thesis : “The Hounds of Baskerville”, a new adaptation of Sherlock Holmes, I think, is good because the events are made clearer and the setting fits the story better. Sherlock also seems to be smarter.

It is said that book adaptations are bad. But I don’t think so. The Hound of The Baskervilles was adapted well, in my opinion. The setting is better, Sherlock appears smarter and some of the events are more clear.

The Hounds of Baskervilles” has a few events that are based on The Hound of The Baskervilles. Baskervilles has a research lab, which implies that Charles and Henry were murdered. The novel makes it seem like Charles died by natural means, which wouldn’t have been as interesting. But on page 25, Dr. Mortimer wrote, “There are no reasons whatsoever to suspect that Sir Charles Death could be any other than Natural Causes.” In the adaptation, people pay attention to Henry and his strange behavior because they want answers. The movie also makes the death of the villain more clear, even though Frankland in the film is the antagonist. Stapleton in the book is the antagonist. Watson said in The Hound of The Baskervilles page 208 that there was “no chance” to find Stapleton’s footsteps because of the rising mire. Stapleton had the option of escaping, but the mud might have covered them. He could also have escaped because he knew Sherlock would be searching for him on the island. The Hounds of Baskerville’s depiction of Frankland is clear, and it makes us aware that he doesn’t survive. The movie’s adaptation is excellent because it shows Frankland getting blown up.

The Hound of The Baskervilles was set in a more appropriate setting. It seems more plausible to me that an unnatural creature came out of a secret research facility rather than just appearing out of the blue on a moor. It would be interesting to see if our guess was correct, because Sherlock denies that the mutated hound exists. The novel takes place on a moor and in the first few chapters, it does not seem that Charles has been murdered. Dr. Mortimer stated on page 25 that “there is no reason whatsoever to suspect foul play or to imagine that Sir Charles death can be anything but natural.” On page 30, Mortimer, a man of education, believed that Charles had been killed by a mystical dog. Also, in the film the Grimpen Miasma was replaced by the Grimpen Minfield. Both places play a major role in the plot, and I think it would be more interesting to watch someone or something blow out of a minefield than being slowly sucked into a mire. It’s just another way that I am right.

Third, Sherlock is smarter than in “The Hounds of Baskerville”. The Hound of The Baskervilles is similar to “The Hounds of Baskerville”, in that both Sherlock and Watson are solving a crime. Watson does the bulk of the writing in the book. On page 75, Sherlock tells Watson, “I’d like you to just report facts… leave the theory-building to me.” This is fine with me, but I would rather read that Sherlock thought for a long time before he came up with the answer. It was really cool that Sherlock deduced what happened in a movie. Sherlock had more work because the film was set in a research center. He had a lot to do: he was forced to think up ways to get in, question the people present, find out if Charles’ death was caused by mutated animals or someone, then he was required to discover who was responsible, how and why. To me, it was more entertaining to watch Sherlock go through all of that rather than read about his reading Watson’s reports, spying on others, and figuring out the who, why, and how. It’s my third proof.

Some people may disagree with me. They might claim that the movie’s plot was different and ruined the whole story. Although the plot of the movie was different, it didn’t ruin the story. They did it so that those who had read the book would be able to enjoy the movie. Otherwise, they’d know the story. The movie is still interesting, despite the different plot. This is because the film is full of surprises, which keep the audience’s interest. This movie is an excellent adaptation.

The Hounds of Baskerville, to my mind, is a successful adaptation. It has a clear storyline, an excellent setting, as well as making Sherlock seem like a brilliant detective. It was Sherlock who deduced the truth about the murder. The Hound of Baskervilles movie isn’t the only one that does a good job of adapting a novel. There are many good movies that are based off of books. Even if the differences are small, they are still very good.

Table of Contents

An opening

Videogame Violence: A Campaign Against It

Video Game Violence

My point of view

In closing

Introduction

This is the beginning of the piece. It is the first section and serves to introduce the topic.

Videogames have been the subject of much criticism as their popularity has grown. Videogame violence as entertainment is considered vile by many. “Death Race”, a 1975 release, was one the first games to suggest violence. The small stick figures were supposed to look like “gremlins”, and when hit by a moving car, they would change into gravestones. (cite) The context and content of the game are laughable in today’s culture. Many people say that we have become desensitized by violence. Violence will remain a major selling point for games as technology advances and entertainment expands.

Psalm 11 says: “The Lord test the righteous. His soul hates evil and those who love violence.” The videogames can be seen as a form of entertainment, a means to relieve anger, boredom or frustration. Colossians 3:12-24 says, “Whatever you are doing, do it with passion, like you’re working for God and not men. You will be rewarded by the Lord for your hard work.” This verse can be interpreted many different ways. A person’s God-given talents are used to play a game, share their belief, and be proud when they reach professional status. Violence should not be promoted, but neither is it harmful to the society. “33 Bible […] games”

Videogame Violence Many anti-violence activists link violent videogames with gun control. Adam Lanza was armed with a Bushmaster XM15 E2S rifle in.223 caliber, a SIG Sauer P226 9mm handgun and a Glock 10mm handgun on December 20th, 2012. Lanza is credited with killing over 20 children. This will serve as a foundation for gun legislation in the U.S. Videogames were blamed by many groups for his violent outburst. Iowa State University’s Dr. Craig A. Anderson, a psychologist, said:

There are a number of factors that can lead to extreme acts like school shootings. These include feeling socially excluded, being bullied or not accepted by others. (Anderson)

Eric Harris (left) and Dylan Klebold (right) entered Columbine Senior High School, on April 20th, 1999. Their plan was to attack teachers and students. Written plans stated that the two men planned to murder over 100 students, mostly club and athlete members. Before they killed themselves, the two had murdered 13 people and injured 23 others. Eric and Dylan played “Doom”, a popular FPS game or “first person shooting” game, which was the first to be released. The US military was given this game in order to teach soldiers how to kill efficiently. The boy’s computer also contained a Doom game with two players. Both had unlimited ammo. They were unable touch or fight the players, who were killing the non-player characters (NPCs).

MAVAV is one small group fighting against violent videogames. The site contains controversial statements such as “Videogames Not Fun”, Videogames Not Fun”, and “Everything just a game for gamers”. These groups want to stop violence being used as entertainment. (“MAVAV”)

Videogames that are violent require players to be involved in the violence and play the games with them. The new game controllers encourage more physical interaction and the games become more interactive. This could lead to an increase in juvenile violence. Violent games cause players to believe that they can get a reward for inflicting pain on other people. Depending on how many kills or havoc you cause in a game, some games will reward you with new powers, weapons, and abilities. Videogames which reward violence tend to encourage aggressive responses and behaviors in players. Violence in videogames may make people less sensitive to it. (Layton)

In these games, you are given multiple chances to correct your mistakes. In a 2005 study, violent videogames were linked to lowered P300 brain waves. These are associated with desensitization towards violence and an increase in aggressive temper. The constant exposure of videogames to violence is thought to reduce empathy. Jeanne Funk’s 2004 study of 150 fourth- and fifth-grade students showed that violent games were the most common media to lower empathy. Empathy, or the ability for one to understand someone else’s feelings, issues and emotions is important to mental development, moral equilibrium, and to prevent aggressiveness. (Mosher) (“ProCon.org”)

Videogame Violence has declined in America as violent videogames have become more popular. Between 1995 and 2008 the arrest rates of juvenile murders fell by 71.9%. The arrest rate of all violent juvenile crimes has decreased by 49.3%. Videogame sales have tripled in the same time period. (Corriea). Brad Bushman, in his recent article “Does violent videogames contribute to shootings?” Bushman says:

There is no definitive answer to the question of whether videogames are responsible for violence. Alexis’ rampage was not likely caused by violent videogames. The games themselves aren’t innocent either. Recent reports have suggested that he was mentally ill with anger issues. Videogames are a likely factor. (Bushman), regarding the Navy Yard shooting by Aaron Alexis in November, 2013.

According to some studies, playing violent videogames as a replacement for roughhousing and other harmful games reduces violence in adolescents. Videogames that are violent allow young boys and girls the opportunity to express their anger or aggression without harming themselves. Others claim that violent videogames are a safe way for children to vent their anger. According to a study from 2007, 46% boys play videogames “to get their anger out,” and 62% do so “to relax.” It is not necessary that a short-term spike in aggression or arousal will lead a child to commit violent crimes. The violent crimes that youth commit are often modeled after videogames. But the violence can still occur even without the games. Videogames allow children and young people to experience laws, rules, consequences, and other aspects of violence in a controlled, safe environment. Violence, war, death and other issues can be explored in some violent games without real-world effects and consequences. (Whiteman)

This statement, while harsh at first glance, is true. Football is, in essence, a twisted version of fetch. The players are trying to hurt and damage the other side to reach a common goal. In the US, football is the most widely watched sport. Sports and other forms violence are often overlooked when video game violence is discussed. In its simplest form, wrestling is brutality. The aim is to inflict as much pain as possible on the opponent, until they submit, or harm them enough until their body falls apart and becomes unconscious. It is not a new form of entertainment; gladiators used it in the past. Violence is not a reason to shun these forms when discussing entertainment.

Most people worry about children and young people when they talk about violent videogames. As people age, they lose the old selves that they were and adopt new morals. First Corinthians chapter 13, verse 11 says that “When I became a man, I gave up childish ways.” As I grew up, I let go of my childish habits.” (“33 Biblical […]Games”) This is true also for violent videogames. The game will not harm you if it is played for pure entertainment. Violence, tragedy, or war can be presented in moderation. Children will take on some of the information.

Personal OpinionWhen it is brought up that videogame violence is ruining children, I become defensive. We both love videogames as entertainment, but only entertainment. I believe they are more than just a way to entertain, but can also be used for things such as: teamwork, puzzle-solving abilities, learning and teaching, and even reaction time. It is important to have good reaction timing, not just in games but in everyday tasks such as driving and sports. Skills in teamwork will help you build stronger relationships with your friends, help you work together as a group and excel at your job. The ability to solve puzzles can be applied in everyday situations and in solving problems. Videogames can also be a powerful teaching tool. It is easy to understand and it can capture students’ attention. This popular game, “Minecraft,” has been implemented in elementary schools.

I’ve played videogames most of my adult life. They are a great way to relax, have fun, and connect with friends. Videogames’ social aspects and their ability to bring together youth today far outweigh any “harmful” effects. Videogames provide entertainment, education, and competition. They are also a great way to earn money. Videogames are a lucrative and entertaining way to earn money.

I think that the statement “videogames increase aggression” is false. In the game you’ll be aggressive and strive to win. This is why you should be frustrated if there are obstacles in your way. It’s possible that the player appears aggressive while playing, but gamers know it isn’t true. The claim that “life will become a joke” is also made, but it’s not necessarily a negative thing. It may cause people to be more social and joking around, but serious issues will still be treated with respect.

When I hear about desensitization, I have an opposing view. To be desensitized is not to endorse violence. It’s merely to teach you how to deal. Soldiers must deal with violence every day, including death. Growing up, I’m sure they learned to cope. It allows the person to avoid overreacting or exaggerating a minor issue, such as a fractured bone or general blood. This is a good skill to have as a doctor, parent, or bystander at a murder or crime.

It is not necessary for me to engage in activism when the topic at hand is as simple as videogame violence. MAVAV seems to have little impact and is not necessary. They should not let their children play these games and they should not have any say in how other parents or mothers raise their children. If mothers feel they must deny their kids the social aspects and skills of video games in order to protect their child, then that’s their decision. Other parents shouldn’t be forced to do the same. MAVAV claims like “Videogames are not fun”, “Everything is just a game to Gamers”, or “Textspeak Linked with Violent Videogames”, are ridiculous when you consider their evidence. Textspeak and violent videogames are linked by the MAVAV. They claim that “Textspeak” is a process where words are shortened, numbers added to text messages to make them “cooler”. This form of texting is extremely annoying. It is enough to use the following example: “RU cmin out 2nite?” The deciphered version is “Are you going out tonight?”

ConclusionViolence is a major selling point for games, despite the fact that new research and results are released daily. There are many opinions expressed by researchers, based on data collected from various studies. Those against videogame violence want to demonstrate the negative psychological effects and major terroristic incidents. Aaron Alexis was an outlier among the gamers who like semi-violent interactive games. The psychological advantages of the pro violence side appear to outweigh that of the anti-violence.

In the Bible, God is said to hate violence and “hate the wicked” and those who love violence. Gamification is not a real game, but a form entertainment. If the player is deliberately committing violent actions in the video game, they should be discouraged from playing. It is not fair to those who enjoy games to try to eradicate all violence.

Some people might think that videogames are evil. Psalms 119:37 states “Turn me from looking at useless things, and give life to your ways.” There are arguments on both sides. Proverbs 22.6 states that when you teach a young child how to behave, they will never leave it. Videogames are best left to parents while the child’s young. It is important to instill good morals and create a child with a mature spirituality.

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s music is loved all over the world. The music of Mozart’s operas like Don Giovanni has been sampled in many movies, TV shows and other entertainment forms. It is possible to document much of his life. For example, we know he lived in Salzburg and Austria. We also know he began composing when he turned five. How did he actually die?

This question is not answered with certainty. As his body has never been found, an autoposy could not have taken place. Instead, people speculate. Others claim that Mozart died from illness. Others believe that Mozart’s death was caused by poisoning. Antonio Salieri – another composer who lived in Mozart’s era – was most often accused of murder. Although he was talented, he never reached the same level of fame as Mozart. The Magic Flute is one of Mozart’s most recent operas. He shouted praises as each overture ended. He was jealous of Mozart’s talent, but he also admired his work. Many people speculate that his murder of Mozart was a final act of revenge.

Salieri’s role in Amadeus is not explicitly stated, but it is implied. Salieri speaks to Mozart in the opening scene, while he’s being held captive in a hospital. Salieri’s confession is that I murdered you. In the film, Salieri appears to have commissioned Mozart to create the Requiem. This was the last music piece Mozart composed before his death. However, the movie did not seem to support the usual poisoning theory, but rather implied that Mozart’s illness was due to the effort he made to finish his Requiem. Salieri was Mozart’s “murderer,” because Salieri commissioned him to write the Requiem. However, this claim is untrue. Antonio Salieri is either the murderer of Mozart or the one who commissioned him to compose the Requiem. The same goes for the Requiem. He might have commissioned it, but not been the murderer. This mystery will never be solved.

Birdman ending scene: film analysis

The scene I found most significant and powerful after watching Birdman was the end of the film as well as Riggan’s play. You can’t say when this scene started because the entire movie was shot to appear as one continuous shot. Imagine that it begins right after Riggan’s wife leaves the dressing room. Riggan then starts getting ready for his final scene. He doesn’t just put on the wig. After vocal warm-ups, he takes out a real firearm. The viewers are surprised when they see him check the bullets. Riggan appears to be calmly doing this. While he prepares, the camera follows his every move. The camera is omniscient throughout the entire film. It floats and shows us the purpose of everything. Riggan then raises his right arm and points at the door. Riggan’s arm is raised to point to the door. As soon as Riggan separates himself from the camera, Riggan begins to sing and drums begin playing. As the video moves through the hallway, it becomes obvious that Riggan is the main character. We are walking down a narrow, dark hallway. Drums and darkness add to the sense of dread of what will happen. The camera switches roles as the hallway turns and the man playing drums is seen on the other side. This drummer is a great way to bring the film score alive. Riggan walks into the frame as the camera moves backwards, focusing on the drummer. As if Riggan is being played off by the drummer. The lights become blue as Riggan leaves the drummer. This indicates a change in the environment, and that the final scene is approaching. This transition is also aided by ambient sounds. It begins with a sneeze, followed by a make-up artist speaking to Riggan. The camera only moves slightly in the frame so that we can see his surroundings. Riggan is walking up to the entrance of his house when he hears thunder. A red light is silhouetted on him, and he appears calm. He enters. The camera slowly spins around him as he goes through his role. The two actors are also visible as the camera rotates. Riggan is the center of attention. He walks in the spotlight after he finishes playing his part and shows his true self. He fires his own gun. He drops out of the picture. Now the camera is looking at audience. Standing ovations are given by the audience. The critic is the only person who does not stand. She stands up, and everyone claps as she leaves. The camera moves up to the light, and we see our first intentional cut. The camera cuts to shots showing a comet, a jellyfish, & percussion line. These are his last moments. Riggan is able to find his happiness within this scene. He does not care about critics, and the audience’s standing ovation is the end of his life. He is finally happy.

Acting Is Better Than Lying

Both lying and acting are very different, but they share some striking similarities. In both cases, the truth can be hidden or strewn throughout the spoken words. The quality and technique of an action can vary greatly from one person to another. The two are still different despite their similarities. Numerous differences separate the two and each adds to the grayline between them. Acting is the better option. They differ in their teaching methods, the truth they conceal, and how either is done.

Many people are beginning to recognize the importance of learning acting. There are many places in every town and city that will teach you how to act. If you want to learn how to lie, you will be lucky if you can find an online video or a small website that is willing to help you. If someone wanted to meet other people who were interested in learning about lying, it would be difficult to do. The good news is that young people can attend their local school to learn about acting and to improve on their skills. Schools around the world offer acting classes to anyone interested in the subject, willing to practice and pay a reasonable price. Even prestigious schools around the world focus solely on acting and performing. Acting is a skill that is highly regarded and appreciated if done correctly. Lies are still looked down on, even when they’re done so well no one would be able to tell.

Sometimes, there is a hidden truth in every performance. It can be hidden to make the audience question its meaning. It can also be plainly stated, often a person or fact that is added to the performance. The truth is often tainted when it comes to lying. It can cause everyone to doubt the truth, including the liar. The difference is so great that it’s evident. While lying can destroy the truth, acting can enhance it. Even if the original truth was simple, acting makes it beautiful. Although acting can sometimes ruin the truth or make it more complex than necessary, it is usually a way to enhance it. It is something people are eager to learn and own as their knowledge.

The theatre is also where lying and acting take place. Theater is often the first place that comes to mind when someone considers acting. The theater can be a cozy, small one in the town where they live or it could be a large theater with a lot of artistic value. They will always imagine theater, no matter how often. People tend to associate lying with a more sinister image. People often associate bad characters with smoky bars and seedy casinos. There are liars in every place. No matter who you are, whether it’s your child, boss or neighbor, anyone can lie. Lies are even more dangerous because you can never be sure if the person lying is telling the truth. When it comes to acting, the audience is more aware that they are watching an act. The reason for this is that they have usually paid to attend the show.

There are some who believe that lying is better than acting. They may be those who used to belong to the lying group and believed that the skill was dying because no-one had ever perfected it. Some may argue that lying is the mother of acting. The art of deception is a product that has evolved from its origins. You could lie every day and nobody would ever know. Lies are even more effective than acting when they can be a secret that only the liar knows. A performer may be able to recite his lines and play the part perfectly, but never understand the true meaning. A liar, on the other hand, knows that almost everything they say is true. They are wrong, but they still believe that. Even if it is all true, acting has a beauty that lies can never match.

So, to conclude, it is better to act than lie. The fact that so many people love it has made it possible to teach it worldwide. It is also because there are so many beautiful buildings or comfortable spaces that allow actors to show off their skills in front of people who would like to enjoy it. It is also important to note that acting, with its graceful elegance and grace, can add meaning to a simple truth. In terms of morality, acting is better than lying since the person listening knows you’re telling a mistruth from the start and is willing to listen.

The Rob Reiner-directed film “Stand by Me” is a legend based upon Stephen King’s novella The Body. Gordy is the writer of the movie and the narrator. It’s a story about him, his three best buddies and how they found a missing boy in Oregon State while hiking at Castle Rock. Gordy wrote a story about their adventure many years after the event. They discover friendship through their own adventures. The story of ‘Stand by Me,’ which explains the friendship between two boys, Gordy, and Chris and how they lost their innocence, is interesting. This adventure was a significant part of Gordy’s story. This is why it’s interesting to use Gordy in ‘Stand by Me.’

“Stand by Me’s” most important element is the strong bond between boys. These were children with problems who were abused or isolated from their parents, schools and towns. They were so similar that they resorted to each other for comfort and support and built their own place. In the film, there are four main boys and their unstable relationships and family life. They do not know how much love they receive from their parents. Gordy’s family, particularly his father loves brother better at American Football than Gordy. Gordy and his parents couldn’t accept the sudden passing of their brother. They never gave Gordy any attention afterward. Chris is his best friend and he’s a wise, sincere boy. However, the rumor about his brother has made him a “Bad Boy”. In addition, his father abuses him in the home. Teddy Duchamp is the son of a war veteran who is likely suffering from PTSD. Teddy Duchamp is as violent as Chris’ father, but he respects him because he is a war-hero. Vern’s older brother is cruel to him because he is fat, clumsy and uncoordinated. All four boys share the same situation: they aren’t loved by their families and parents. To survive, they relied on one another. They are like a family in that they support each other, accept each other, and do not ask for anything.

The film has multiple relationships, but the one between Gory, Chris, and Gordy is the most significant and important. This relationship has had a profound impact on Gordy’s life. As the narrator tells the story, Chris is going to grow up and become a lawyer. The adventure in the film must have had a great impact on his future. Chris and Gordy, although they are very different boys have a strong bond. Gordy elder brother, is the most popular member of the household. He enjoys Gordy’s stories, unlike his family. Gordy’s father wasn’t happy about Gordy hanging out with Chris. Gordy felt disappointed by his father’s inability to see human nature. Chris’s real character is caring and intelligent. He is not a milk thief, as adults think. Chris, who is hardworking and independent, is unlike the other boys in his class because of an unstable family. Chris is the leader and tolerator of the group. Chris is important to Gordy “The Invisible Boy” as a brother, parent and friend. Chris is also the person leading Gordy’s future. Chris, the person who led was inspired by Gordy. Chris is also going to be a lawyer.

This film is about the loss and curiosity of young people. The search for the body took them over 20 miles through the mountains and woods. It is unrealistic to expect children to achieve this goal. Their adventure is about finding the corpse, but they grow into adults quickly and lose things along the way. Smoking does not express the boys’ growth. It represents a rebellion against adults. They may have appeared to the viewer as “the older boys” due to their smoking. However, smoking can be seen as a sign of rebellion. They are certainly growing. They had a lot of fun and danger that children or adults would never have experienced. In the end, the boys were chased by a gang of ace criminals who planned to steal the corpse search achievement. Gordy’s growth is accelerated by this incident. The corpse was discovered as planned by the boys. It was their first encounter with a corpse. They also did not have as much fun they thought. Ace Gang is next. Gordy takes the brave step of pointing a gun at Ace in order to protect his family and friends. Gordy’s rebellion is his first against an adult, showing that he has grown.

Gordy’s voice is an important part of understanding the meaning and purpose of “travel”, the main theme of this film. Gordy tells his story about his 12-year-old journey with a friend, which shows the importance of that event in Gordy’s life. Gordy, the protagonist, is accompanied by his best friend Chris who encourages Goody and supports her writing. Chris says, “You are going to become a wonderful writer someday Gordy.” Gordy is the protagonist and narrates the movie. This film is not about the journey of 4 boys but rather a reflection of Gordy as a young boy. This viewpoint allows viewers to experience Gordy’s memories, rather than traveling with the four boys on their journey. Viewers can follow Gordy through his memories to see how he changes and gains or loses things.

It was their innocence and lack of knowledge that led them to this journey, not the wisdom or common sense of adults. Children have a similar freedom of choice as adults, but without the knowledge and rules of the world. As an adult, you lose your freedom and sensibility from childhood. The children were able plan and execute the journey because they are not adults. Due to their lack of a license and car, the children walked the distance along the railway track. As they did not have a job, they only had a small amount of money to spend and were limited to eating bread and sausages. They were children and could travel spontaneously, unlike adults. Gordy has experienced a journey that many viewers have not had the opportunity to experience as children. However, they can relate and compare their experiences with those of the main characters.

The film shows the pure and innocent friendships that are lost as people grow older, the vivid memories from their youth when they were all together. Gordy’s adventure is also full of the childlike innocence that everyone remembers as they grow up. In this film, the boys have shown that they can only rely upon each other and that they trust and collaborate with others.

Resources

Original: Accumulated

Paraphrased: Collected

EDN, et al. The English Journal. Vol. 83, no. 2, 1994, pp. 82-84. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/821164.

“EXHIBITS.” USU Digital Exhibits, exhibits.usu.edu/exhibits/show/standbyme/inspiration.

“Stephen King (Creator).”TV Tropes, tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Creator/StephenKing.

Women in the early 1900s were expected be submissive. They should obey their husbands. Women were seen as fragile, weak and in need for protection by men. In Ragtime Emma Goldman challenges the chauvinistic view of women and their role in society.

Evelyn first introduces Emma Goldman when she attends Goldman’s gathering, in which Evelyn expresses that she does not believe in marriage. Goldman says marriage is like slavery for women. She rejects the notion that women are only useful for homemaking and sex. Goldman quickly continued, “the truth is women cannot vote, can’t love who they like, can’t develop their intellect and spirit, they are not able to live a life of spiritual adventure, they don’t have the ability to do that, comrades! Why? Does genius exist only within our wombs or elsewhere? Can’t we write books, do learned scholarship, play music and offer philosophical models that will improve the world? Must our fate be physical?”

Evelyn Nesbit’s beliefs and actions are the exact opposite of Emma Goldman’s. She’s the “first sexual goddess”, the “celebrated female” (P4). Younger brother, for instance, worships her beauty despite never having met her. Mother’s brother, who was younger than her, loved Evelyn Nesbit. He would think about her constantly. Evelyn’s beauty helps her become a prominent member of society. (P5) Evelyn’s dependence on men was another reason she had to be dependent. She continued to be Stanford White’s mistress after being raped by him at the age of 15. Emma Goldman tells Evelyn that her marriage with Harry K. Thaw resembled prostitution. Goldman told her that you are no more than an intelligent prostitute. Accepted the situation and succeeded. What kind of victory was it? The prostitute’s victory. What have been your consolation? The consolation for men is cynicism. Disdain, contempt, and sarcasm. She will also lie to the court during her husband’s trial, as they pay her to do so. “She had agreed that she would testify on behalf of her husband for a total of $200,000. The price of a divorce for Evelyn was set to be higher. You value propriety like every whore. You are a creature that is a part of capitalism. The ethics of the capitalist system are so corrupted, hypocritical and distorted that your beauty has no more value than gold.

Mother, the Victorian housewife typical, sits in the middle between Emma Goldman’s and Evelyn Nesbit’s. Ragtime begins with the reader getting the impression of her relationship to Father being rocky. “The marriage appeared to flourish during Father’s prolonged absences.” “He was attentive and solemn, as befitted his position. Mother closed her eyelids and placed her hands behind her ears. Father’s sweat fell onto her breasts. She began. She thought: I know that these are happy years. The only thing that lies ahead is great disasters. When he’s away, she takes over the running of Father’s business and discovers that she has more to offer than being a housewife. Mother was now able to speak clearly on such topics as unit cost and inventory. P112 Father, on his return to the home, notices that his wife has become more independent. His wife is now independent and he feels that he no longer needs to be there. Everything has been going smoothly. Mother curled him up against her back and cradled his strange coldness. E.L. Doctorow mentions Mother’s reading of Goldman’s novel. “He found a pamphlet that dealt with family limitation, and its author was Emma Goldman. The anarchist revolutionary.” She becomes sexually aware and realizes that she doesn’t love Father anymore. This feeling was probably there all along but not recognized. “…she could not believe that she thought that, but she did. She condemned him as an idiot. When he left, she wondered why she ever had such a thought.

Emma Goldman’s influence on Evelyn and the other female characters was profound. Evelyn represents all that Goldman is against. Evelyn, a symbol of American sex and beauty, represents male infatuation. Goldman helps her understand the negative implications of her lifestyle. Goldman is responsible for Mother’s changes, because she read Goldman books. Mother represents what Goldman tried to prove from the beginning, namely that women can be independent, can do much more than simply being wives, and can break free of their oppressive relationship. Goldman’s views are crucial to the plot of Ragtime, as they influence Evelyn and Mother, along with society in general.